When I attended public school in York,
Pa., in the 1930s, the teacher began each
day by reading 10 verses from the Old or New
Testament without comment. We then recited
the Lord's Prayer and the Pledge of
Allegiance -- two decades before the words
"under God" were added.
But things have changed. Since the
turbulent 1960s, the secularization of
American culture has proceeded apace. The
"free exercise" of religion guaranteed by
the First Amendment has been under
increasing pressure by the ACLU, the
National Education Association and other
liberal voices who insist that "religion" be
banned from the public square.
Americans differ on the role of religion
in society, but virtually all of them
believe that public schools should not be
used to proselytize for one religion over
another. But they disagree on whether the
Bible, sacred to Jews and Christians alike,
should have any place at all in the
curriculum of tax-supported education.
Some educators insist that the Bible be
banned from public schools because its
presence would seriously breach the
"separation of church and state" -- their
words, not the Constitution's. They contend
that teaching the Bible would promote
sectarian strife and subvert our
multicultural society.
But the tide may be turning. A recent
survey conducted by the Bible Literacy
Project funded by John Templeton found that
90 percent of the top American English
teachers consulted agreed that the Bible has
had a profound and positive influence on the
"laws, morals, politics and other
literature" of Western civilization, and
that knowledge of the Bible is crucial to a
well-rounded high school education. They
emphasized that there are no legal barriers
to teaching the Bible as literature and that
the Supreme Court has not banned the Bible
from public schools.
To no one's surprise, recent surveys have
documented widespread historical illiteracy
in our public schools. One poll found that
more teenagers can name the Three Stooges
than the three branches of government. And
the top 10 hip-hop tunes are better known
than the Ten Commandments. A Gallup poll
found that fewer than one-third of the teens
could identify any quotation from the Sermon
on the Mount and that 1 in 10 thought Moses
was a disciple of Jesus.
The illiteracy on weighty issues also
reflects the corrosive impact of a
"political correctness" that questions the
wisdom and legitimately of Western
Civilization itself -- including the
contribution of "dead white males" such as
Homer, Plato, Aristotle and Shakespeare.
Respondents to the Temple survey believe
that teaching the Bible as literature in the
public schools would help close this crucial
knowledge gap and foster an appreciation for
our rich Western culture. A knowledge of
history, geography, politics, art and
science -- and religion -- is essential to a
well-rounded education. But they believe
that teachers should not press their
personal religious convictions.
All literate Americans know that the
Bible is a treasury of literature, history
and poetry, but that it is preeminently a
book of religion -- portraying the
pilgrimage of the Jewish people and the
emergence of Christianity. So understood,
the Bible serves as an introduction to the
moral heritage of the West.
Like Shakespeare and other Western
thinkers, America's Founders drew heavily on
biblical wisdom. The signers of the
Declaration of Independence were profoundly
influenced by the Bible's somber but hopeful
view of man and history. They confidently
asserted that humans were "endowed by their
Creator" with certain basic rights,
including "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness."
William Shakespeare has likewise had a
profound influence on American thought. The
Bible and Shakespeare are by far the most
quoted sources in the Western world. In
Bartlett's Familiar Quotations, the King
James Bible rates 53 two-column pages while
the Bard gets 85 pages. In contrast, Charles
Dickens gets four pages and Herman Melville
three.
Both the Bible and Shakespeare deserve
an honored place in America's public
schools.
Ernest W. Lefever is a senior fellow at
the Ethics and Public Policy Center in
Washington, D.C., and author of "Ethics and
U.S. Foreign Policy."
Source URL:
http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/20050814-095410-4602r.htm